A point
One latitude/longitude pair, six decimals or more. Fewer decimals and the EU system cannot resolve the plot, so the statement gets challenged.
Seven commodities, one cutoff: 31 December 2020. Every plot geolocated, every batch legal, every shipment covered by a Due Diligence Statement before it clears customs.
A bag of cocoa passes through a farmer, a cooperative and an exporter before an EU importer ever sees it. The proof the law wants, the exact plot it grew on and that the land was neither cleared after 31 December 2020 nor farmed against local law, is born at the first hand and has to survive every one after. Break the relay anywhere and the importer carries the fine.
The importer files, but the proof is born at the plot. Coordinates, land title, harvest records: lose any of it at a handoff and the container stops at the border.
Trust us moved containers into Europe for decades. A supplier's word, a scheme logo, done. Now the law says show us the ground the goods grew on.
EUDR · Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 · Article 3Everything the law asks is a data pipeline wearing a legal costume. Bindu builds it in seven moves.
Capture each parcel on a map or as a GeoJSON upload: coordinates, harvest window, the land document behind it. Once, not every shipment.
Bindu validates every plot against the current rules: six decimals for a point, real vertices for a polygon over 4 hectares, and no parcel left out.
Article 29 sorts every country into low, standard or high risk, and the tier sets how much due diligence you owe. Bindu screens it per batch.
The Article 9 field list fills itself from the plots and the batch: CN code, weight, origin, geolocation, time range, supplier, the attestation.
Submit the statement to the EU Information System. It returns a reference number, the one thing customs actually checks.
The reference travels with the customs declaration. Customs cross-check it against the Information System, and the shipment is released.
Every plot, alert, filing and evidence pack lands in a hash-chained archive. Every actor in the chain carries the same five-year retention duty.
Article 29 sorts every country into three risk tiers, and the tier decides how much due diligence you owe and how often you get checked. Pick a tier. Watch what you owe change.
The list is the country benchmarking of May 2025 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093). Standard risk is the default, and it gets no simplified declaration.
Coordinates are the link between a real farm and the satellite that checks it. The rules are mechanical, and so are the failures.
One latitude/longitude pair, six decimals or more. Fewer decimals and the EU system cannot resolve the plot, so the statement gets challenged.
Enough vertices to trace the real perimeter, as GeoJSON. A single point on a big farm lets the scan radius swallow neighbouring forest.
Mass balance is not accepted. One bag of unknown origin contaminates the whole container. Verified and unverified lots stay apart, physically and on paper.
Geolocation is required for every parcel that fed the batch. No representative sample, no materiality threshold. Cattle is the one case a single point never satisfies.
The regulation was postponed twice and simplified once. Ignore the 2024 and early-2025 deadlines you may have read. These are the ones in force, and the deadline is close.
The cutoff. Land cleared after this date is non-compliant, whether or not the clearing was legal locally, and it does not reset when the land changes hands.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 enters into force, replacing the old Timber Regulation and starting the compliance clock.
The first country benchmarking list is published (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093), sorting origins into low, standard and high risk.
Regulation (EU) 2025/2650: a second postponement plus real simplification. Annual statements, printed matter dropped from scope, downstream operators reuse the upstream reference number.
Application date for large and medium operators. The real deadline, and it is close.
Application date for micro and small operators.
The most misunderstood part of the law. From orbit, routine farm work looks like deforestation, and a compliant farm can still trip an alert.
Shade pruning, stumping for regeneration, a polygon drawn too close to the forest edge, tropical cloud cover: all of it reads as tree-cover loss. An alert is not a verdict. Most die at a desk, once the geometry is fixed or pre-2020 records are attached. The supplier who can prove it becomes the low-risk partner every European buyer is now hunting for.
Plots collected once, every batch after it mechanical, the whole trail archived. That is the pipeline. Pick a piece to see the job it does.
A map or a GeoJSON upload takes each parcel's coordinates, harvest window and land document. Collected once, reused on every shipment after.
Get the plots right once and every shipment after is mechanical. Bindu validates each batch, builds the GeoJSON and the DDS, and keeps the five-year vault, updating your filings when the rules change again. What it buys you is the low-risk supplier every European buyer is now hunting for.